Juvenile Justice - Should we punish them or should we not!

Two kids in school, thirteen year olds, fought with one another. Let us call them A and B. One of them, the boy A broke the nose of the other.

Complaints were made and the matter went to the Principal of the school. Mother of B was all worked up. Look at the way A has broken by son, B's nose. All bloody and harsh. A is a rogue, a rowdy and has to be punished strongly so that he learns his lessons. Mother of A on the other hand says that the fight could have gone either way. It was just fate that B ended up with a broken nose. It could have been A easily. And will mother of B talk about it the same way if it had been the other way round.

For one, most of the 'crimes' of the juvenile are minor in nature. And your own point of view will determine the way you think and behave about such juveniles. Don't we not find neighbouring women who cry hoarse about your kids as if their kids are absolute nice ones.

Right, Nirbhaya is an heinous crime. No doubt. When we make a law, a heinous crime itself becomes a major definition. We need to remember, people will misuse 'heinous' to suit their needs. 

In a crowd, not just children even grown ups act and do different things. What they will not do alone, they will do in a group. This is a crowd psychology that everyone knows about. So when a young boy is with a crowd of ruffian adults who display rowdy-ism, then they too would display the same. The same boys drink with them; smoke with them. Who is at fault? The grown up or the kid?

It is the grown ups who need to be taken to task and the kid should be given the support he badly deserves. And what the courts have done in the 'Nirbhaya Case' is fair for the kid. Let us not raise any more questions about it and try to hang the kid. He needs the society's support to become a normal child. Let us give him that!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

நீண்ட நாட்களுக்கு பிறகு ஜெயகாந்தன் படித்தேன்.

நீண்ட நாட்களுக்கு பிறகு ஜெயகாந்தன் படித்தேன். அம்மா கொடுத்தார்கள். 'உனக்குத் தான் ஜெயகாந்தன் என்றால் பிடிக்குமே!' என்று சொல்லி, என் கைகளில் கொடுத்தார்கள். மறுக்க முடியாமல் வாங்கி வந்தேன் என்று தான் சொல்ல வேண்டும்! அம்மாவுக்கு எப்படி தெரியும், இப்பொழுது எல்லாம் காண்ரேக்ட்களையும், தொழில் சம்பந்தப்பட்ட செய்திகளையும் படிப்பதற்கே நேரம் போதுவதில்லை என்று? வாங்கி வந்தது இரு வாரங்கள் தொடப்படாமலேயே ஒரு ஓரத்தில் இருந்தது. மூன்று தினங்களுக்கு முன், அம்மா 'அந்த புத்தகத்தை திருப்பித் தாடா. நான் படிக்க வேண்டும்' என்றார்கள். 'இன்னும் பத்து நாட்களில் கொடுக்கின்றேன்', என்று நேரம் வாங்கிக் கொண்டேன். நீண்ட நாட்களுக்கு பிறகு ஜெயகாந்தன் படிக்கத்தான் செய்வோமே! மூன்று தினங்கள், நான் வேறொரு உலகத்துக்குள் சஞ்சரிக்க தொடங்கினேன். அந்த உலகம், கஷ்டங்களும் நஷ்டங்களும், தனிமையும் மேன்மையும், மாறி மாறி ஏற்பட்டு, ஒரு நிமிடம் நம் கண்கள் வேதனையில் பனிக்கின்றன; மறு நிமிடம், காதலால் கனிகின்றன. ஏற்க முடியாத முடிவுகளை எடுக்கும் பாத்திரங்கள்; மறுக்க முடியாத மறக்க முடியாத நிகழ்வுகள்! அந்த உல
Read more

GST - what it means to us?

From the vague vantage point that I occupy today, I write this article. Therefore, the information I am privy too is very little except most that is available on the media. Based on this information, I give you another vague perception of what to expect. However, the lines of progress are clear. GST has grown old under discussion stage itself and has lost most of its original charm. 1. There will be a central GST and a State GST. Sounds very similar to Central Sales Tax and the State Sales Tax. Only advantage, no two numbers. One number but two accounts to pay. You make a mistake, you pay the penalty. They don't adjust between themselves! Same as today. Yes, of course, the Excise is not there! That is a big saving. 2. Who does the scrutiny or audit checks? The fight is still on. Both want the right to do the audit. Because that is where they can make their money. Who would leave that out? From the way, it is progressing, both will end up making the audit on our accounts. Res
Read more

British Conquest of India - Unwritten History - Part I.

I was reading a book titled '1857'. Every Indian would know the significance of the year. It was a detailed presentation of what transpired that year over a period of six to seven months and how the Indian princes and princesses, literally committed harakiri by fighting not in unison.  But what it reinforced was my understanding of the Indian History that the fall of India was not due to technological superiority as many historians would portray nor is it due to any grand strategy that the British had. History as we read in our books is mostly wars, kings and generals. Unfortunately, history is made not by any of them but by the social circumstances that are in vogue then. These social changes happen gradually over decades; sometimes over centuries and millenniums. Unseen and unsung. These changes bring about wars, kings and generals who are noted in history as the change makers. But in reality, they are the outcome of these social changes. British came to India to t
Read more